Writhing two

Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works by using computer.do you agree or disagree?

In contemporary socielty,the proliferation of computer using is changing the socilety and our lives markedly,as a result ,more and more people have a opinion that public museums and art gallaries should be replaced by computer.Personally,I do not agree with that and I think the public museums and art galleries still a crucial part in our life.
We sould not deny that the computer send us a vast convenience that we can see historical objects and works at home at anytime we like .Furthermore,not considering the fee of electricity ,it is almost free for us to see the historical objects and works by using computer,consequently ,we will safe a lot of money .
Despite the large number of advantages in using computer to see historical objects and works,the benefits of public museums and art galleries can not be ignored.we can go to public museums and art galleries to see the historical objects and works with our own eyes,due to this ,we will feel the historical objects and works in depth ,especially,it can create the our sense of art.
Public museums and art galleries also paly a key role in one city's culture.A city which is rich in culture will be atractive for the tourists who will promote the city's economy.Take London for example,the vast number of public museums and art galleries is the major reason why there are so many tourists vist it every year.
It is clarity the influence of computer in historical objects and works has beening increasing raise,but public museums and art galleries still have their own place.Both are their benefits in showing the historical objects and works .