I agree that giving aid to poorer countries can in some measure release the poverty of the poorer countries, especially the countries in the Africa where people are suffering increasing poverty which can cause not only lack of food but also severe diseases. But I have to confess that a lot of aid which was used to benefit the people living in the poorer countries did not even approach its real aim. In this article I will discuss whether giving aid to poorer countries has a more effective affect.A host of countries, located in Africa and Asia, are suffering poverty. The reasons attribute to the poverty have the geographical factor and political factor. This has become the reality, so the wealthy countries, especially the countries located in Europe and America, should hand out their wealth to help them. Fortunately these countries had taken their steps to help those poorer countries through sending or loaning money to poorer countries. However at the end of these activities most people in the poorer countries did not benefit from this money the people in the government own this money instead, which is called corruption. At the end, the gap between rich people and poor people become deeper and deeper.Whether it means that it is not necessary for wealthy countries giving aid to poorer country? the answer is no. these activities should be continued but in a different way. Wealthy countries can give aid through sending them life necessity and helping these poorer countries building public facilities which I think are the basis for a country want to develope its economics and improve people's living condition in its country.In conclusion, if the wealthy countries give aid to poorer through the methodology I mentioned above, it will has more object effects than passive effects.